Search results for "efficiency worker prefork"

Apache config for Worker MPM vs Prefork MPM

By on July 13, 2011 in Wordpress

Some installations of Apache will have been compiled to work with either Prefork or Worker MPM, but most by default are compiled only to work with Prefork. Changing to Worker MPM may allow your server to handle much higher traffic, more user sessions, with less RAM use. Your site or server will not scale well if it is running Prefork MPM. Worker is a bit more difficult to set up properly, and has some restrictions regarding functionality of PHP … 23, 2, 3, 0 and 75.58

Comments { 1 }

How to Configure APC Cache on Virtual Servers with PHP running under FCGId

By on November 8, 2010 in Wordpress

…in httpd.conf’s virtual hosts section. restart apache do some performance testing and raise your server and thread limits to sane levels in httpd.conf If possible, you may wish to run Apache with Worker MPM instead of Prefork MPM. More information about Apache Worker MPM vs. Prefork MPM » Installation Suggestions and Modification of Defaults Be sure to install the newest version of APC, 3.1.9 as of the last revision of this post (I assu… 4, 0, 0, 0 and 10.34

Comments { 43 }

Résumé

By on October 24, 2008 in

…ure and design for open source content management systems Linux Apache MySQL PHP web server administration Postfix Dovecot Sendmail mail server administration DNS & Domain Name Registration LAMP performance tuning: Apache Prefork and Worker MPM, MySQL query cache, APC OpCode & User Cache Script and database-driven interactive technology using PHP, MySQL, Javascript, CSS video — delivered via DVD, CD, or web training media web-based on… 2, 0, 0, 0 and 5.17

Comments { 0 }

Tuning Apache and MySQL for Best Performance in a Shared Virtual Hosting Environment

By on August 22, 2011 in Wordpress

…lled RAM) [OK] Slow queries: 0% (13/1M) [OK] Highest usage of available connections: 25% (51/200) [OK] Key buffer size / total MyISAM indexes: 72.0M/1.1G [OK] Key buffer hit rate: 99.9% (1B cached / 1M reads) [OK] Query cache efficiency: 78.2% (967K cached / 1M selects) [OK] Query cache prunes per day: 0 [OK] Sorts requiring temporary tables: 0% (0 temp sorts / 74K sorts) [OK] Temporary tables created on disk: 20% (7K on disk / 38K total) [OK] Th… 1, 0, 0, 0 and 3.28

Comments { 1 }